SSC CHSL Important Notice: SSC CHSL 2018 Important Notice PDF. Official Notice Regarding the SSC CHSL 2018-19 Exam. Candidates who have applied and appeared for the CHSL Exam conducted on 29-09-2019 shall check here the most important official notice regarding the results.
Staff Selection Commission has released the Notification for the recruitment of various posts under Combined Higher Secondary Level(CHSL). Totally the commission has announced 5,789 vacancies. Out of which 1,855 are for Lower Divisional Clerk (LDC)/Junior Secretariat Assistant (JSA), Postal Assistant (PA); 3,880 are for Postal Assistant(PA)/Sorting Assistant (SA)and 54 for Data Entry Operators (DEO). For that the commission has conducted the recruitment drive The Combined Higher Secondary (10+2) Level Examination-2018 (Tier-II) was conducted by the Staff Selection Commission on 29-09-2019. This examination was arranged for 45,101 candidates out of which 36,112 candidates appeared in the examination. The result of the said examination was declared on 25-02-2020 wherein 32600 candidates (30822 unique candidates) have been shortlisted for appearing in the Skill Test against 5918 tentative vacancies. 4560 candidates were rejected on the grounds of unfair means (UFM).
Some of the rejected candidates have submitted their representations to the Commission requesting for revisiting the decision of the Commission about their rejection. In addition, the following instructions were also given on the cover page of the Question-cum-Answer Book of the said examination:
“Candidates are strictly advised not to write any personal identity (real or imaginary, e.g. name, roll no, mobile no, address, etc (other than the name and address given in the
question) inside the Answer Book otherwise their Answer Book will not be evaluated and they shall be awarded zero marks.”
SSC CHSL 2018 Important Notice:
5. It has been observed that a majority of candidates have followed the instructions of the Commission meticulously. However, 4560 candidates did not follow the instructions of the Commission and Sensitivity: Internal & Restricted mentioned their identities (real or imaginary, e.g. name, address, mobile number, etc) inside the Answer Books. On the basis of the identities (real or imaginary) inside the answer book, identities of the concerned
candidates can be recognized at the evaluation stage and hence all these candidates have been rejected under UFM by awarding zero marks. The action of the Commission in rejecting 4560 candidates is, as such, in accordance with the instructions of the examination.
6. However, in view of the representations received by the Commission, dealing with the above issue, the Commission has decided to constitute a committee of experts to examine the matter and give its recommendations for the consideration of the Commission.